<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Complaint of the day: signatures</title> <atom:link href="http://spellwight.com/2008/10/complaint-of-the-day-signatures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://spellwight.com/2008/10/complaint-of-the-day-signatures/</link> <description>so don&#039;t ask if you don&#039;t want to know</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:46:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: hectormac</title><link>http://spellwight.com/2008/10/complaint-of-the-day-signatures/#comment-4164</link> <dc:creator>hectormac</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:17:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.spellwight.com/2008/10/complaint-of-the-day-signatures/#comment-4164</guid> <description>&lt;p&gt;Now you&#039;ve got me paranoid; I thought mine was dainty and discreet. Hmmm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But I do agree with your point. It&#039;s the sparklies and smilies that get me.&lt;/p&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you&#8217;ve got me paranoid; I thought mine was dainty and discreet. Hmmm.</p><p>But I do agree with your point. It&#8217;s the sparklies and smilies that get me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://spellwight.com/2008/10/complaint-of-the-day-signatures/#comment-4163</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:47:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.spellwight.com/2008/10/complaint-of-the-day-signatures/#comment-4163</guid> <description>&lt;p&gt;Brava!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It doesn&#039;t bother me as much as it bothers you, but I often wonder if the people with the long sigs realize how ineffective they are. I mean, when I see one with 12 lines and blinking graphics I speed right past it. I read the short ones and even check out the URL after the name. By giving me all that info in their sig, they are making me care even less.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dani in NC&lt;/p&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brava!</p><p>It doesn&#8217;t bother me as much as it bothers you, but I often wonder if the people with the long sigs realize how ineffective they are. I mean, when I see one with 12 lines and blinking graphics I speed right past it. I read the short ones and even check out the URL after the name. By giving me all that info in their sig, they are making me care even less.</p><p>Dani in NC</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: taipa</title><link>http://spellwight.com/2008/10/complaint-of-the-day-signatures/#comment-4162</link> <dc:creator>taipa</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 02:12:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.spellwight.com/2008/10/complaint-of-the-day-signatures/#comment-4162</guid> <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Your Official Name on that site/subject&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This one actually drives me up the wall on forums and other discussion groups where each post is automatically marked as being made by you.  Your (general your) username and avatar are attached to every freaking post!  You don&#039;t need to add it again!  I think it&#039;s weird when people put their name in their signature; or worse, something like &quot;Love, TheirName&quot;, or even &lt;i&gt;worse&lt;/i&gt;, have &quot;Love, TheirName&quot; as a signature and &lt;i&gt;also&lt;/i&gt; write it as the last line of their post. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I do, however, think it&#039;s appropriate when they put their RL name in the signature - that way it&#039;s at least a different name from their username.  The way you demonstrated above is great.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also don&#039;t mind cute sayings as much, as long as they are short.  Relevant ones are even better.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I hate graphics in signatures, and I hate random huge lists.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also appreciate it when signatures are relevant to the forum.  For example, on Cosplay.com most people have a costume To Do list, or an In Progress list of costumes they are actively working on.  This works well, except when people go overboard and make it huge (and rainbow coloured, and double-spaced, and...)&lt;/p&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Your Official Name on that site/subject</i></p><p>This one actually drives me up the wall on forums and other discussion groups where each post is automatically marked as being made by you.  Your (general your) username and avatar are attached to every freaking post!  You don&#8217;t need to add it again!  I think it&#8217;s weird when people put their name in their signature; or worse, something like &#8220;Love, TheirName&#8221;, or even <i>worse</i>, have &#8220;Love, TheirName&#8221; as a signature and <i>also</i> write it as the last line of their post.</p><p>I do, however, think it&#8217;s appropriate when they put their RL name in the signature &#8211; that way it&#8217;s at least a different name from their username.  The way you demonstrated above is great.</p><p>I also don&#8217;t mind cute sayings as much, as long as they are short.  Relevant ones are even better.</p><p>I hate graphics in signatures, and I hate random huge lists.</p><p>I also appreciate it when signatures are relevant to the forum.  For example, on Cosplay.com most people have a costume To Do list, or an In Progress list of costumes they are actively working on.  This works well, except when people go overboard and make it huge (and rainbow coloured, and double-spaced, and&#8230;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: snowcalla</title><link>http://spellwight.com/2008/10/complaint-of-the-day-signatures/#comment-4161</link> <dc:creator>snowcalla</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:47:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.spellwight.com/2008/10/complaint-of-the-day-signatures/#comment-4161</guid> <description>&lt;p&gt;I agree.  Put what you want....but keep it short and sweet.  I don&#039;t mind, very much, on emails if people have a bit more.  But in yahoo groups, on vBBs, etc....please keep it short.&lt;/p&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  Put what you want&#8230;.but keep it short and sweet.  I don&#8217;t mind, very much, on emails if people have a bit more.  But in yahoo groups, on vBBs, etc&#8230;.please keep it short.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chesneycat</title><link>http://spellwight.com/2008/10/complaint-of-the-day-signatures/#comment-4160</link> <dc:creator>chesneycat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:43:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.spellwight.com/2008/10/complaint-of-the-day-signatures/#comment-4160</guid> <description>&lt;p&gt;Word.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No more than four lines, no images, and properly .sig delimited so that email/newsgroup software can remove it automatically.&lt;/p&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word.</p><p>No more than four lines, no images, and properly .sig delimited so that email/newsgroup software can remove it automatically.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: busyme</title><link>http://spellwight.com/2008/10/complaint-of-the-day-signatures/#comment-4159</link> <dc:creator>busyme</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:41:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.spellwight.com/2008/10/complaint-of-the-day-signatures/#comment-4159</guid> <description>&lt;p&gt;*applauds*&lt;/p&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*applauds*</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: spellwight</title><link>http://spellwight.com/2008/10/complaint-of-the-day-signatures/#comment-4158</link> <dc:creator>spellwight</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:27:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.spellwight.com/2008/10/complaint-of-the-day-signatures/#comment-4158</guid> <description>&lt;p&gt;Erm, then I had to go back to your email signature and see what it was!  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let me edit my rant a bit. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm, then I had to go back to your email signature and see what it was!</p><p>Let me edit my rant a bit. <img
src='http://spellwight.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cavaticat</title><link>http://spellwight.com/2008/10/complaint-of-the-day-signatures/#comment-4157</link> <dc:creator>cavaticat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:51:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.spellwight.com/2008/10/complaint-of-the-day-signatures/#comment-4157</guid> <description>&lt;p&gt;Guilty as charged.&lt;/p&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guilty as charged.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached

Served from: spellwight.com @ 2012-02-12 16:57:04 -->
